Return-path:X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 0;andrew.cmu.edu;Network-Mail Received: from po2.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew/usr/js9b/Public/camc.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew/usr/js9b/Public/camc.dl) ID ; Wed, 16 Sep 1992 04:47:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from po5.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Wed, 16 Sep 1992 04:47:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ecl.psu.edu (eclb.psu.edu) by po5.andrew.cmu.edu (5.54/3.15) id for +dist+/afs/andrew/usr/js9b/Public/camc.dl; Wed, 16 Sep 92 04:46:59 EDT Received: from vn-gateway by ecl.psu.edu with PMDF#10043; Wed, 16 Sep 1992 04:46 EST Received: by hogbbs.scol.pa.us (1.65/waf) via UUCP; Wed, 16 Sep 92 04:36:32 EDT for +dist+/afs/andrew/usr/js9b/Public/camc.dl@andrew.cmu.edu Date: Wed, 16 Sep 92 04:35:09 EDT From: wce@hogbbs.scol.pa.us (Bill Eichman) Subject: possibilities of university To: +dist+/afs/andrew/usr/js9b/Public/camc.dl@andrew.cmu.edu Message-Id: Organization: The Heart of Gold BBS, Lemont PA Comments: Validated From: Thomas_Price@kanga.fac.cs.cmu.edu Subject: Re: just do it >What is everybody >else doing? Right now I'm seemingly the second-most active person reading this >list; I'm surely not actually the second-most active person. Please help me >out and put the dangerous implications to an end. Well, it wouldn't surprise me if not too many others were concerned about this conversation. I was surprised enough that JS reactivated the list when he got back into the university environment, surprised, but glad, as it somewhat refocused my thinking from my summer studies and income, towards networking and writing about this whole community business. I'll be real interested to see if others speak up. Though it seems to me that we might want to consider 'advertising' this list in a few places, to see wether or not it appeals to anyone else.... I do want to consult with some folks who are more computer-literate than myself, and decide wether an electronic magazine devoted to these topics is practical considering our resources here. I might have to start a new bbs, or accomplish the equivalent, before I could host-site such a beast, though. Once again, thanks to Jon Slenk for hosting this virtual salon. >>Well, as I've said before, when I was younger, I had a vision of >>communities which was very close to the type of thing you're describing. >>I tried to motivate my friends to help me do it-- many were very >>enthusiastic about it, but very ordinary money problems and the >>pressures of ordinary life seemed to foil every attempt, and I couldn't > >What's ordinary life? :-) Sounds like "extraneous activities which dissipate >resources" to me. Well, you claim to one of the few who escaped the pressures of ordinary life, so this shouldn't apply to you, but things like school loans, credit card debt, rent, a vehicle, clothes for the workplace, and the 9 to 5 grind and the 24 hour a day demands placed on the salaryman make up the bulk of ordinary life pressures. The added pressures of a wife and child(ren), who are in effect held hostage to the financial success of the family, multiplies these pressures many times. So, are you saying that those millions of young people who are filled with vision and activism while in college, but who 'give up' and become working drones a few years after graduation, that is, those who don't want the monastic life--- are essentially non-entities, and are entitled to no place in community life? Consider the implications. Yes, it is "extraneous activities which dissipate resources", of course-- but 99+% of your and my peers don't see it that way. They see us as being utopian dreamers out of touch with the real world. Do you really want to criticize me for wanting to build communities that contain enough of both worlds, the modern and the thoreauvian, to provide a home for a couple of hundred thousand more of the 99+%? >have recently outlined comes to be in a recognizable form. But we both agree >that they are darn good starting aims, yes? The effort of pursuing them will >create marvelous by-products. Yes, very, very good goals to aim at, and absolutely, pursuing them will lead to some of the best of all possible by-products. One of the things I've talked about is the possibility of networking together many dozens of different types of communities, which are seperate entities, but which have agreements and links which allow them to trade products, exchange members, and provide support for each other. I'd be interesting in figuring out wether we can build any types of links between the types of communities you want to build, and the types of communities I want to build. >Again and again I'm reminded of the Kilgore Trout short story which is a >dialogue between two pieces of yeast, aware only that they are suffocating in >their own shit, and unaware that it is carbon dioxide and that they are >making champagne. So, what you're telling me is that here on earth we're all like yeast organisms, dying in our own excrement, and possibly making champagne. Who is the godlike being that gets to drink this champagne? (as we might be thought of as godlike beings to the champagne yeast, who die for our palates in the specially created environment of the fermenting cask) If no-one drinks our champagne, does that mean our death in choking shit was in vain? (I'm reminded of Gurdjieff, who claimed that the lives and death's of the 'sleeping' masses had only one purpose, and one meaning-- it provided "food" for the 'spiritual forces' which relied on us for sustenance as sheep rely on the grass. Only the few people who "woke up", gurdjieff claimed, escaped the dull fate of being food.) >>Unfortunately, there are less young thoreaus around than you might >>think, > >Uh ... none? How can there be any less than none? Well, there's me. That's at least one. I bet we can find a few more. Are you surprised at my claim of thoreauvian merit? I'm reminded of a scene attributed to Maslow. Teaching a class of grad students, he asked them (paraphrased), "Who here are going to write the great books, and create the great ideas, of the future??" No-one replied; they all sat mute. "If not you, then who?", Maslow asked... If we are not the thoreaus, then who? >>It's hard to believe what the pressures will be like when you're in your early >twenties. > >Oh, this must be more of this "ordinary life" business I didn't understand >earlier ... :-) I keep my life is so free of pressure that some people find it >tiring -- usually when I'm shedding their friends' responsibilities and >entanglements that they want to lay on me just like they do everybody else >in normal social situations. Yes, it is.... Maybe you could give some more details about your lifestyle, and how things are handled in your ashram? >>But scenarios are scenarios, and they don't raise babies. This talk will >>only start to matter to most people when real property, a real roof, >>real food, beds, and income are involved. Assume that I fully and >>absolutely want you to succeed in your scenario-- now what I need to >>talk about is _How_? > >Give me twenty-four years. I sometimes think of encouraging everybody to >retire early, say at fifty, and then we pool our resources, freedom, and >experience to do some things. It might not be possible beforehand. I won't >be surprised if it's not. But it'll be worth trying to see if it is. I happily give you 24 years. But I'd still like to hear your plans for _How_ to get there.... The early retirement thing could be good for a lot of people. I think I've spoken before about using at least some of the communities as something like rural 'retirement' homes, and quite a few of my friends have told me that they plan to do something a lot like the 'retire at fifty' idea you mention. I can't wait for that, myself, which is why I'm focusing my effort these days on buying a smallish piece of land for myself and my closest tribe. >crystallize. My chief studies, now, are not funding or material, >but are devoted to figuring out what sort of conceptual structures about >the world my visions imply (and what visions my conceptual structures about >the world imply), boiling them down as simply as possible, and infecting >people with them. Eventually the visions will begin to coalesce all by Yeah, I understand that. What types of success have you had? >of daily life, of course, but that's taken for granted!) "There are a thousand >hacking at the branches of evil for one who is hacking at the root." If you're going to hack at the root, you need a bigger axe, and greater skill, than those who only chop at branches. What methods have you found to be effective? >My reading so far on the hippie movement and the hippie communitarian >movement has made me think that they were done in by biting off more than >they could chew: trying to synthesize too many divergent spiritual elements >into a coherent whole, trying to incorporate everybody and his brother >in a very egalitarian way without regard for their maturity or discipline, >and trying out unprecedented social arrangements. All at once! Eeeeeeeeyow, >what bravery. (I am sure that this is an idiosyncratic reading, reflecting >my particular concerns to a large degree.) I'd say that's a very accurate analysis. Sometime this winter I'm hoping to make photocopies, and scan some files, of the books I've found in PSU's Pattee library-- they put together a surprisingly good collection. I'd like to have them in my library, and be able to email around relavent files. If anyone else wants to chip in and do the same types of literature searches in their own libraries, well, that would be great. The "community-building university" idea that we were tossing around in the last incarnation of this list is still a damned good idea. This is a way that folks who aren't in any position to actually pitch in and create households or communities can involve themselves and provide a very valuable effort. The 'university' will need to start by building a core library of texts, papers, clippings, photos, tapes, & e-files. >As I've indicated before, all of my practical plans are built around the >idea of isolating the elements of the final vision and learning how to >make them work one at a time, always as the side emphasis of a (fairly) >normal group community such as we know can work. At some future date >when the participants are ready, we take our knowledge from the >string of group house-experiences and throw it all together at once. Maybe you could paint out a scenario for me, of what this means and how it works?? >And, of course, that's just the plan. Maybe once in a million lifetimes it >would actually work out like that. True enough, once in a million. And I'm a hardhead, who wills this lifetime to be the million. Everybody's got their idiosyncrasies. You know, I like that 'chatauqua in belize' idea very much. If you, or anyone else ever goes down there to look around, get in touch with me beforehand and I'll see if I can't help out with camera/videocam expenses and the like. I very much want to gather as much info as possible about that whole carribean region, and helping someone else do a little research and exploration during their vacation could give me phone numbers, addresses, and contacts down there is a high priority for me. The same for other explorations, too. If anyone is able to go to New Alchemy or Arcosanti or Farrallones or any of the other sites where community is being studied, and wants to take pictures, video, etc, then I'll be glad to buy/trade usable photos and tapes for the 'university'. Later, Bill prev message next message