Return-path:X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 9474;andrew.cmu.edu;Jon C. Slenk Received: from conrad.res.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew/usr/js9b/Public/camc.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew/usr/js9b/Public/camc.dl) (->angst+camc@cmu.edu) ID ; Tue, 1 Jun 1993 14:12:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from conrad.res.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Tue, 1 Jun 1993 14:12:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.13.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.conrad.res.andrew.cmu.edu.pmax.ul4 via MS.5.6.conrad.res.andrew.cmu.edu.pmax_ul4; Tue, 1 Jun 1993 14:12:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1993 14:12:04 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jon C. Slenk" To: +dist+/afs/andrew/usr/js9b/Public/camc.dl@andrew.cmu.edu Subject: Fwd: Space Investing (2 of 2) References: <1879.2C0A7C80@ofa123.fidonet.org> Fred: is Not I've edited this down somewhat. The basic info I wanted to pass along was the idea of putting money together in some way to leverage our plans. ---------- Forwarded message begins here ---------- From: Wales Larrison To: space-investors@cs.cmu.edu Subject: Space Investing (2 of 2) Message-Id: <1879.2C0A7C80@ofa123.fidonet.org> X-Mailer: mailout v1.26 released Source-Info: Sender is really vac@FURMINT.NECTAR.CS.CMU.EDU >4. Is the long term goal, item 'D', too way-out for credibility, or >does it add to the appeal of this fund and make it distinctive? >(one descendant to move to space.) No, not too way out. Rather tame in my view. Run the numbers out... Let's look at the case of a long-term investment program to "buy our way into space", using a 50,000 person "pro-space" population investing on a 20 year time horizon. 50,000 persons $1000 investment annually growth=8% yields $2.47B If we assume a 10:1 leverage potential (10% down...), that same 50,000 persons can invest $25 Billion - which should be enough to start a real permanent Lunar base, with a resonable expection of participating. If we assume they invest $2000 annually for 20 years, 50,000 persons $2000 investment annually growth=8% yields $4.94B which can be leveraged up to almost $50 B. Even better. This tells me the space enthusiast community can BUY the future they want - if they are willing to invest in it. Now 20 years may seem long to some people, but I've bought a house with a 30 year mortgage, and I've set up a college fund for my kid over a 18 year horizon, so I don't think a 20 year investment planning horizon is unreasonable to think about. Is 8% per year a reasonable return to expect for 20 years? I believe this is reasonable, since it is actually slightly lower than the historical 50-year return from stocks in general (based upon Ibbotsen's and Sincfeld's study of stock market returns from 1920- 1990). That return should be achievable with diversified mutual fund investing in the S&P 500 (there are several of these around). A diversified portfolio of small stocks should do 1-2% per year better, but with a higher variability (risk). Is $1000-2000 per year per person beyond reason? This is a much more personal question, but I don't think so. That amount is only about $20-40 per week, and is LESS than the amount an individual is allowed to put away in an IRA to accumulate tax free (depending on income...). Furthermore, the money is not necessarily dedicated to "space investments", nor is it out of reach, necessarily, for real financial emergencies. I'm putting substantially more than that away each year through a 401(k) program from my employer. On the _average_ $1000-2000 should be available for savings in general, and this is only a slightly differing form of savings. Is 50,000 persons an unreasonable population? This is about 1/4 the combined membership of the Planetary Society and NSS, alone. Plus you can include interested parties from the technical societies and elsewhere. In my opinion 50 K people is not unreasonable - since this program is basically only a self-directed savings program, and not focused on any specific investment, but just on a reasonable savings effort. As a nation, the US needs to increase its savings rate. This is one way - with potential significant benefits in the future for the space community. If it can be shown that more focused space investments are good finanical strategy, then the 50,000 is probably on the low side, since anyone who is saving and investing might be interested in a good finanical strategy. >5. How should it be structured: a club, mutual fund, company, co- >op, _____? I would highly encourage concentration upon the investment club approach. Investment clubs are a well-established method of allowing individuals to invest in stocks and other securities. They are basically small, group-directed mutual funds, which take advantage of the participation of several individuals. Their diversification is dependent upon the resources the members place in the club, but the risk is spread over several individuals, and the larger pool of resources from several individuals allows a larger diversification. Setting up something like an investment club is simple - the legal regulations are low and there are plenty of pre-planned organizational structures available from the National Association of Investment Clubs. From my involvement with investment clubs in the past, it is pretty simple - if you are serious about going about it, and willing to consider good investments in related fields (the number 1 objective of your investment club has to be to make GOOD long-term investments, and sometimes good space-oriented investments are not immediately apparent. However, other good investments will make money - which in turn, can be invested in good space investments when they are identified. Don't invest just to invest.) If you are interested, I would recommend the following readings: "Wall Street on $20 a Month", by Phyllis Humphrey (Wiley & Sons, 1986). A good introduction to investment clubs. "The Wall Street Gurus", by Peter Brimelow (Random House, 1986). A very good introduction to investment newsletters and their investment strategies. "Pay Yourself First", by Michael Hayes (Anacom Books, 1979). A very good introduction to mutual fund investment strategies. And you might contact the National Association of Investment Clubs at 1515 E. Eleven Mile Road, Royal Oak, Michigan 48067 for their startup kit - they provide information, standard forms and organizational paperwork, a monthly newsletter, stock and financial advice, and even theft/embezzlement insurance. (IF you decide to pursue this through them, it is about $30/year per club, and $6 per member.) The up-side opportunity is huge - and the down side seems pretty small (over 20 years, how bad can you get hurt by setting up an IRA and investing in a diversified stock market mutual fund?). I have in a low-key way, been encouraging this over the past several years and am putting my money where my mouth is. Thus, I have been encouraging people to approach space activities with an investor's perspective. It's part of the reasons why I write "Space Technology Investor/Commercial Space News" and post it on sci.space (which Vince reposts here)-- trying to provide information about the business side of space, and trying to provide data tracking developments in the commercial space industry. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Wales Larrison Space Technology Investor -- Wales Larrison Internet: Wales.Larrison@ofa123.fidonet.org Compuserve: >internet:Wales.Larrison@ofa123.fidonet.org ---------------------------------------------------- Jon Slenk Carnegie Mellon EVERYTHING is angst+@cmu.edu Pittsburgh PA Disclaimed prev message next message